We shouldn’t be surprised by now, but occasionally the scale
of the contempt for our natural heritage such as that shown by George Osborne
in yesterday’s autumn review retains the capacity to stun. Salient then
among the chancellor’s decisions to eject
large portions of whatever remained of his cabinet’s green credentials,
backing energy intensive industries like steel and cement (to the detriment of
the comparatively greater provider of jobs of the renewable sector) and
threatening to do away with laws to safeguard wildlife, was the decision to
plough ahead with every one of the DfT’s road schemes that were in any way eligible to be built. Given the tenuousness of many the schemes' position with funding, it is in a way a pretty considerable acheivement.
It’s hard not to see this as anything other than a reversion
to old Tory form, a rush in the tide of the times to what once was familiar
ground, hoping perhaps for crumbs of comfort in what at one point were old
certainties. Never mind then that this particular model of infrastructure
was outdated
and out-argued a long time ago. The beast of our current car culture
had never gone away, the appetite for roads simply appeased until now by a
tightening of fiscal strings, a kind of silver lining in a wave of bitter news.
All that has changed and it’s hard not to feel as if we have
been transported back to the worst of the eighties: huge youth unemployment, a
surge of homelessness waiting in the wings (that is in itself a timebomb not
set to go off until sometime next year) even the ghost of Margaret Thatcher
resurrected on our screens. Above all a party in power there almost seems
no option but to vilify; all too easy to dismiss and loathe whatever their
actual nature or intent. And the new roads over it all, like a
resurrected standard from a long gone war or a mantra for an old school model
of how business and people should move.
That the great seismic shift that saw Labour delivered to
power, that saw countless road schemes effectively scrapped and a renewed sense
that a sustainable transport policy was finally on our doorsteps has now been
annulled is suddenly clearer than ever. And was it really any wonder in a
decade and a half that saw trainfares slowly or rapidly rising even amid signs that
many more people would have travelled like this had they been able to afford
it? It wasn’t exactly helped by Clarkson presiding over an ever more
credulous mass, driving cars up mountain sides like some kind of leaden fuelled
conquistador, motoring down to the Sea of Galilee itself, proclaiming to all
who were willing to listen that life behind a wheel is still a fundamental for
fulfillment.
At times like these, it’s harder than ever not to look for inspiration to a time when a mass of largely disaffected segments of society staged a huge rebellion on exactly this issue, just as it seems reasonable to hope that we may well be set to see something of a repeat. And with the well documented contribution of road traffic to climate change, with the knowledge that increased road capacity only leads to increased car use, there is clearly a huge need for a response of comparable scale and passion, if we accept that things don’t always repeat themselves in exactly the same way.
Without sufficient outcry and the hope of reconsideration,
the schemes laid out in this autumn review look more than foreboding. For
the countless hectares of irreplaceable land that will be lost to the plough,
lost to us and taken from the habitats that they form and help maintain, it is
nothing short of full blown tragedy. And it would be easy to see as
dismaying that so many may feel themselves to be left no option but to protest
at a time when our collective efforts would be better spent in any number of
more constructive ways. It would be easy were it not for the knowledge
that such protests always hold the apparent but vital irony that however dire
the thing they fight, there is strength and liberation to be had in the act of
resistance.
If it seems futile to urge this government to still strive
to do something other than oiling the wheels of yesterday’s industries or
presenting favours to their friends in privatised big business then we have a
rich history of dissent to draw on and be inspired by. And the lessons
such history lends may still hold the promise of how we might persuade Osborne
and his colleagues to set a better course than this; a better course than
populist postures that set us back decades and which have only ever served to
carve our country into isolated pockets of what’s natural while propagating
social sprawl that will become ever more out on a limb as the oil wells
continue to dry.
0 comments:
Post a Comment